Person vs. PERSON: Today’s Bondservant

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

What would you think is probably the most dangerous obstacle everyone has to navigate in life would be? It’s my contention this obstacle would be our own mind and the minds difficulty in distinguishing the difference between a Belief and real Knowledge.

Beliefs are based on opinions derived from other people, inner discernment or even faulty external teachings. Knowledge however is based on credible research and actual experience. There are three good rules to follow for confirmation of truth, 1. Is it Measurable, 2. Is it Observable, 3. Is it Repeatable.

A way of remembering this is whenever we stumble on new information or are told something keep in mind you “Want to know M.O.R.”, Measurable/Observable/Repeatable.

These are recommended criteria that will be employed in looking at the difference between “The Person vs. The PERSON”.

The meaning of a sentence or statement hinges on the words being used and can be measured by the words used and the definitions. Too often there seems to be a fear of the word Person or it’s derivatives, and as a simple word it’s harmless. We often hear that the Legal Society has changed the definitions of words, which isn’t true.

Many Words have been reclassified as Terms, tools of the Legal Society which they can be defined according to the use. Unfortunately we deal with the legal realm too often and need to realize that we are no longer dealing with common words and phrases but are now juggling Terms instead of Words. Did you observe a change there? It’s no longer Words, but now they are Terms. This is referred to as Reclassification, probably the most used activity in Legalese. If something is Reclassified is can easily be moved from your possession.

The smallest nuances of changes can have important hidden messages, such as seen in the title of this article, ‘Person vs. PERSON’. According to the Associated Press Styles Manual the use of “V.” is reserved for court cases, while “VS.” is appropriate for casual use. These nuances are used repeatedly, and a slip of the tongue or text can hold serious implications! Often we may sign something that states that we “Understand the terms of a contract”, but we need to know this isn’t only referring to the Rights & Duties within the contract but also the Terms/Words being used to construct the agreement. Too often a translator would be beneficial, this would be no different in a legal venue [court].

Let’s delve into this mysterious Person and look at the resources provided to explain this, apologizing in advance to the “Truther or Patriot” sect this wasn’t referenced by Peter in KJV Acts 10:34 “Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
35 But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him”.
The KJV is about the only “Version” i’ve read this in aside from the Aramaic, the others are more explanatory withe the use of Favoritism, Partiality, or even more precise “God doesn’t play favorites”. Which is the accurate explanation of this verse, He doesn’t observe the King over than the Serf!

In pointing to script•ure in reference to the “respecting of Persons” why would we think this is the only place where that statement exists?
28 U.S. Code § 453.

Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office:

“I, ___ ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ___ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 907; Pub. L. 101–650, title IV, § 404, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5124.)

Are you a Corporation?

This is often claimed to be the case by many who haven’t studied business or contract law and many types of Corporate Body’s exist, such as Trust Estates, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies Llc’s, Limited Partnerships and General Partnerships. Being Corporate in perception is not the same as being a Corporation. However, for and actual Corporation to exists there exists a few required elements such as:

1. Officer’s, namely a CEO, Secretary, Treasurer etc.
2. Corporate Rules.
3. Regular Meetings.
4. A Compact and maybe a Charter.

These are only a few of the elements, which the bellybutton you and i don’t possess.
In a street conversation with a Judge regarding this he referred to the PERSON as a “Thing” and often “It”. This reminded me of “Cousin It” from the television or movies.

It’s crazy how often the media provides Truth, not only in the movie The Matrix, but also go back and listen to ‘Secret Agent Man” and the chorus “They’ve given you a number and taken away your name”! They always want the number, don’t they?

Today’s system has provided plenty of examples in regards to the Person and where it begins for us, so let’s first look at the popular word Matrix.

Matrix: Original document from which all others are derived, also: A mold, or cast.

Both Ma & Trix are feminine, and we obviously realize the source of life. What of this “Original Document” being referenced here?

In a conversation regarding Revised Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Professor Linda Rusch was discussing the perfection of security interests and the use of the correct legal name of an organization (Blanket term) and it’s registration which the state is required to maintain some interesting information is brought to light. In discussing these legal documents which prove an organization exists Professor Bruce Markell interjected and referenced the Birth Certificate.


This idea didn’t start in 1953 with the Uniform Commercial Code, it was discussed by Colonol Edward Mandell House with President Woodrow Wilson.

“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging”.

This is an appropriate point to introduce another Term relating to The Person.

PERSONAGE: Arbitrarily creating an Estate trust named after you and claiming to own this thing they created, they have falsely claimed to own you and your assets and to literally buy and sell “you” on stock exchanges, ship “you” out of ports, and tax “you”.

Does this sound familiar? It should because this is named aptly after the BAR as the crime of Barratry.

In long conversations i’ve discovered interesting details such as the “Event” being recorded isn’t the physical birth, but the creation of an organization. Keep in mind, having paper on a human would be slavery! What Vital Stats wrote here is very telling!

re: Birth Certificate as I.D.

Q. “If you don’t have a need to drive though, what are you supposed to use as proof of identification”?
A. “Unfortunately a birth certificate is only considered a valid form of proof of citizenship and not identity, as this document is issued without a photo”.

So the Birth Certificate and the citizen are one in the same, and neither pertain to you. Whenever i see the Term Legal Person the Term citizen also comes to mind, because of this union of their creation by a state entity. Out of the first right (8) Presidents of the United States seven (7) of them were not citizens, but rather British Subjects. This Term Subject was a Term the founders struggled with, so the use of citizen was selected as being more palatable, even though Subject and Citizen are synonymous. Chew on that for a while, sorry.


This registration would then stand essentially as the Legal Title to the state created Juridic Person. As a side note, your Mom & Dad didn’t Register you, they only unknowingly offered “Information” and the registration performed to create a Legal Person was done by the Registrar, notice the seal on the Certificate of Live Birth?

Now we are finding another type of Person, so let’s look at this Legal Term in contrast with our Sentient being.

A human being, naturally born, versus a legally generated juridical person.
Thelawdictionary. org

A living human being. Legal systems can attach rights and duties to natural persons without their express consent.
Cornell Law School

Natural person.
A human being, naturally born, versus a legally generated juridical person. Black’s Law Dictionary, 2nd Edition

We find the difference between the Natural & Juridic Person here very obvious, the Juridic Person is artificially generated, thus an legal artifice existing only on paper. Just like any other artifice such as an organization or agency that piece of paper can do nothing itself and therefore requires an Agent or Spokesman. Do we see the role we’ve been deceived into playing? This is even depicted in state statutes, here’s an example from South Carolina in Title 56 Section 22.
Pay close attention.

(22) “Person” means every natural person, firm, partnership, trust, company, firm, association, or corporation. Where the term “person” is used in connection with the registration of a motor vehicle, it includes any corporation, association, partnership, trust, company, firm, or other aggregation of individuals which owns or controls the motor vehicle as actual owner, or for the purpose of sale or for renting, as agent, salesperson, or otherwise.

See it? For purposes of registration the Nature Person is not included.
This isn’t only specific to South Carolina, but also found at other states due to following rules of the AAMVA, the parent association.


Often i’ve heard that we are seen as dead, or the reference from Black’s 1st edition referring to the citizen as a civilly dead entity. Civil death is very different from what many think of when referring to death. Civil Death is a loss of rights, not the loss of a heartbeat. On the same note, something can not be Dead that never had the capacity (ability) of Life. This Legal Person, or entity, is merely a legal construct or artifice, no more than a piece of paper in a file cabinet, or that Identification in the purse or wallet. This is normally the go to when people attempt to provide evidence of who they are.

This is the same as “The NAME” being summoned at court. This is the breathing of life into that entity, a form of Personage or Necromancy, giving life to a man made fiction. More accurately it’s acting as the Agent or Spokesman for “The NAME” which we’ve found previously is seen as an organization.

This reminds me of a case administrated by Judge Alane C. Laboda in the 20th Circuit Court of Florida where i heard her stop a witness short in their testimony and state that neither herself or the court cared about the Individual, she only cared about the Person. The testimony was about someone’s daily life, but Judge Laboda only wanted to hear about the finances.

KW has talked about his Kentucky Court experience where the Judge found that KW was administrating an organization!

This always reminds me of Act 1 Scene 3 of Hamlet,
“God has given you one face and you make yourselves another”. Why wouldn’t it anger God for us to act in a man-made persona?

When realizing that the world is indeed a stage we would be remiss if the Etymology of Person wasn’t researched. Etymology online is an excellent site that reaches back in the history of language, and we find in this case that the old saying “All roads lead to Rome” even rings true in researching The Person!

c. 1200, persoun, “an individual, a human being,” from Old French persone “human being, anyone, person” (12c., Modern French personne) and directly from Latin persona “human being, person, personage; a part in a drama, assumed character,” originally “a mask, a false face,” such as those of wood or clay, covering the whole head, worn by the actors in later Roman theater.

Without escaping the obvious the Bondservant needs to be examined and in choosing to go way back in history here’s a definition from Strong’s Concordance.

δοῦλος, ου, ὁ
Definition: a slave
Usage: (a) (as adj.) enslaved, (b) (as noun) a (male) slave.
Strong’s #1401 doúlos (a masculine noun of uncertain derivation) – properly, someone who belongs to another; a bond-slave, without any ownership rights of their own.

Most of us were never taught that the early Euro-Americans were Bondservants, or more accurately Indentured Servants who possessed land under Grant from the King that improvements would be made, crops grown, and taxed for Britain. After a period of normally seven (7) years they could buy back this Grant in return for the land and their freedom. It’s no wonder they attempted to separate from the old Holy Roman Empire, aka Great Britain.

In summary, the evidence of our Natural Person being very different from the Legal Person is very obvious, and yes solutions that work are available!

This only requires some easy research. The power is in the most important Right we’ve been granted by The Creator, the Power of Choice.

Do we choose to operate as a Sentient Man/Woman, or as an actor wearing the mask of a legal entity created by man? To avoid tacit acquiescence a notice can be sent to the Federal & State Secretary, or even a notice of Non Corporate Status.

The other option is to be tacit (Silent) and be ruled under the Presumption of Law. The presumption that you represent the state created entity.
As for myself, the preference is to Administrate the Estate. Why be like the Angels who left their First Estate?

#person #legalentity #NaturalPerson #personage #barratry #citizenship

Related Posts

Original Jurisdiction

Has mankind bifurcated it’s authority and responsibility?Who has been granted jurisdiction and authority over the earth? Whether people want to

Read More »